New UN Report Goes Green to Promote “Reproductive Rights”

November 19, 2009

(NEW YORK – Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute C-FAM) The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) released its annual State of the World Population Report yesterday, linking efforts to promote “sustainable development” and affect “climate change” to its “reproductive rights” agenda.  Critics see the report as a thinly-veiled attempt to harness popular environmental concerns in service of population control.

The report, “Facing a Changing World:   Women, Population and Climate [pdf],” asserts that achieving “universal access to reproductive health” would both contribute to declines in fertility and “help reduce green-house gas emissions in the long run.” It calls upon nations to “fully fund family planning services [read: abortion] and contraceptive supplies.”

Full Text:  New UNFPA Report Goes Green to Promote “Reproductive Rights–C-FAM

Hot Air Tour Exposes Global Warming Hysteria

Protest Al Gore in Portland Today, November 18.  The Hot Air Tour is sponsored by Americans for Prosperity.

CLICK BELOW FOR DETAILS:

Hot Air Tour:   Exposing the Ballooning costs of Global Warming Hysteria.

What Will We Do With All the Unwanted Kids?

Abortion:   What will we do with all the unwanted kids? Poor babies, overpopulation, abuse, etc.

By Olivia Gans and Mary Spaulding Balch, J.D.

In the 1960s, we were told that there were too many people, not enough resources, unwanted and abused children, abused women, poverty, and a host of other social ills. When taken separately, these issues all appear to be independent problems, but we were told that they all had a common remedy.

Abortion was touted as the solution to all our social ills. In other words, we were told then that these social problems were best resolved by ending someone’s life. Twenty-five years after the legalization of abortion on demand – - and the deaths of over 36 million babies – - our opponents still continue to argue that abortion is the solution.

FULL TEXT

Science Czar: Air Enviro-Population Control Ads

Friday, October 16, 2009

By Christopher Neefus

Dr. John Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology. (AP photo)

(CNSNews.com) – John P. Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, advocated having the Federal Communications Commission force radio and television stations to surrender free time for advertisements calling attention to what he called “the population-resource-environment crisis.”

He cited, as examples of the type of advertising he was talking about, ads produced by Planned Parenthood, the Sierra Club, and Zero Population Growth (ZPG).

Holdren made his argument for using the FCC to advance his vision for population control and environmentalism in the 1977 book, Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment.  Holdren co-wrote the book with renowned population-control advocates Paul R. Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

‘Not Evil Just Wrong’ New Documentary Film

“NOT EVIL JUST WRONG:  the True Cost of Global Warming Hysteria” is a new documentary film the Green Movement does not want you to see.  The film’s producers have launched a Home Movie Premiere party and the date for the premiere is October 18.  However, you can purchase the DVD and show the film at your church, community center, or home at any time convenient to you.

Ann McElhinney is one of the producers of Not Evil Just Wrong, a documentary that shows the disregard for human life that is rampant among the green movement.

“I think the environmental movement is…a religion. It’s an alternative religion, and it’s a religion that elevates plant life and animals to a level that is on a par with humanity. And I think that’s a really dangerous message,” she contends.  “It ignores humanity – it worse than ignores humanity. Environmentalists think that humans are the problem, that we are bad. They have this notion that the world would be better without humanity. This is clearly not true, and it’s a very anti-Christian message.”—-Source:  One News Now

JOURNALIST GETS HIS MICROPHONE CUT OFF

One of the film’s producers, Phelim McAleer, an Irish-born journalist and member of the Society of Environmental Journalists, recently asked Al Gore at a conference in Madison, WI if Gore would be making corrections to his film “An Inconvenient Truth” in response to the British Court case that found significant errors in the film.

Instead of answering McAleer’s question that Gore doesn’t want to answer, McAleer’s mic was cut off!  Yesterday, McAleer was interviewed on the Glenn Beck radio show.  Here’s the exchange caught on tape:

VIDEO – An Inconvenient Question

Related:

Al Gore and the Death of Journalism — blog post

Phelim McAleer – Breitbart-Big Hollywood article

Forgive Me, Al Gore, for I Have Sinned

Let’s pray the USCCB gets off the green bandwagon.

Neither Babies Nor CO2 Will Harm Planet

Study reveals just how much Green Movement hates people.

Opinion

Portland Tribune September 24, 2009

Have you hugged your “carbon footprint” today? According to a mathematical study of human reproduction choices referenced in an article in the Tribune’s Sustainable Life section, (‘Is Having A Baby Not So Carbon Friendly?’ 09/10/09), a woman who has a baby is leaving behind a “carbon legacy” due to her “behavior,” i.e., having a baby. As a community health educator (retired), pro-life activist and an adoptive mother, I find the Murtaugh-Schlax study to be a deplorable abuse of science. It is an example of people-hating that is so prevalent in the Green Movement. It’s your fault. It’s your children. It’s time to put a spotlight on this disparaging kind of talk.

CLICK TO READ FULL OPINION

Obama’s Grandmother Given Solar Panels by Greenpeace

“I’ll make sure my grandson hears about it.”

Huh?  Does that mean Obama didn’t give the gift of solar panels to his own grandmother?

CLICK HERE TO READ STORY.

RELATED:

Update on Obama’s brother who lives in a hut in Kenya.

Greens Assert Babies Not Carbon Friendly

“Is Having A Baby NOT SO CARBON FRIENDLY?’” asks the Portland Tribune.

What is ‘Environmental Cruelty’?

“I just want people to be conscious of the cruelty and environmental consequences of all their choices, whether it’s food, clothing or family size,” says Stan Jones-Umberger, 54, a software engineer in Southwest Portland. “I believe humans are unique in their ability to understand this and change their behavior accordingly.”—Emphasis added.  Article excerpt.

We at Green Population Control find this article to be morally reprehensible.  It’s completely one-sided.  The image of an unknown pregnant woman exposing her bulging abdomen – from an image library – is not part of of the story.  The story suggests that children are cruel to the planet and profiles mentally-unstable people who chose not to have children to protect the planet.  It’s insulting!

To Pro-Abortion Enviros:  You Are In Our Crosshairs

However, we are way ahead of the game.  This is why we started this blog.  We recognize that God is warning us to be vigilant to the views and intentions of The Greens.

Pro-lifers be forewarned: the enviros will lobby for forced abortions in the future.

We take the position that we are indebted to the Tribune for exposing The Greens who hold extremist views.  The reporter has posed the question, ‘Is having a baby not so carbon friendly?’  We now respond to what we believe is both an anti-science and anti-family position.

First, the premise that the earth is in peril due to human activity is based on flawed science.  We believe in the Scientific Method not the ‘consensus’ among like-thinking scientists.  Visit JunkScience and read the new book by Steve Milloy, ‘GreenHell:  how environmentalists plan to control your life and what you can do to stop them.’

Second, the “study” cited is statistical hogwash.  We’ve studied it and it’s full of mind numbing blather.  We believe the two authors have an unhealthy and hysterical fear of babies.

The study we’re referring to is Reproduction and Carbon Legacies by Paul A. Murtaugh and Michael G. Schlax. (If it’s not at that link try http://www.portlandtribune.com/documents/efiles/carbon%20legacy.pdf or Google it.)

The Greens are over-the-top Earth lovers and very whacked out.  Nonetheless, we in the Pro-Life Movement must take them seriously now that we have a Green President in the White House who has the most extreme abortion views of any president.  (It’s significant that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider, donated $10 Million to the Obama campaign.)  The overpopulation fear mongers have been wildly successful indoctrinating adults in positions of power and, sadly, children — and they include Planned Parenthood, the Population Connection (formerly Zero Population Growth), Population Education, and the Earth Day Network (see their new “Happy Birthday Earth” logo).

Related:

Jefferson High School’s Carbon Footprint Fair

Planned Parenthood Columbia Willamette’s new abortion facility now under construction on Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. is being touted by its “green builder” – B and G Builders – as being “sustainable.” They hope to attain an LEED rating, a highly sought after enviro-rating.

This Fair ties nicely into Planned Parenthood’s population control propaganda and it’s Utopian slogan, “Every child should be a wanted child.”  Note that the new Planned Parenthood is located a few blocks from Jefferson H.S. and across the street from two private schools.

‘Children Are A Blessing Not A Carbon Curse’ – One News Now

‘The Dehumanizing Impact of Modern Thought’ – The Discovery Institute

TAKE MY HAND, NOT MY LIFE.

Student Organizing in Oregon: OSPIRG

If you live in Oregon you probably have heard of OSPIRG.  What is OSPIRG, anyway, you wonder.  Are they simply those pesky students with clipboards knocking at your door during dinner?

OSPIRG is the Oregon State Public Interest Research Group.

Seriously, these kids need to be told “No!”  Our family put a sign on our window that reads, ‘NO OSPIRG.’ We haven’t been bothered by them since.  The last time one of them came by our home they were hawking research in unsafe children’s toys – again!  OSPIRG has been recruiting gullible students at Portland State University (PSU) since the 1970’s.

Unsafe Toys Research A Smokescreen for Subversives

OSPIRG’s slogan is “Standing Up To Powerful Interests.”  They need to look in the mirror by now because OSPIRG has become a powerful interest themselves.

For instance, OSPIRG are influence peddlers in voter turnout:

OSPIRG’s New Voter Project

2006 Elections

In fall 2006, the Student PIRGs’ New Voters Project worked on 80 college campuses in 22 states, including Oregon, to boost voter turnout. We forged alliances with student government leaders, faculty and administrators and recruited over 1,100 students to lead or volunteer on their campus. Our hard-working coalition partners and student leaders registered 75,000 students to vote. Leading up to Election Day, we made 94,000 personalized Get Out the Vote reminders either over the phone or face-to-face.

OSPIRG’s sister organization is Environment Oregon:

Environment Oregon will use the same result-oriented advocacy that made OSPIRG so successful. The new focus of the two organizations will help Environment Oregon and OSPIRG launch a new era of action and advocacy.

Oh yippee.  Oregon does have a dearth of lunatic climate change organizations and agencies.  NOT.

So, to recap, Oregon students can put on condoms, turn down their thermostats, recycle trash, and ride bicycles through rush hour.  But can they read or do simple arithmetic?  Hmm.  Makes me wonder if PSU still has high school-level classes in Algebra and Writing.

RELATED:

University of Oregon’s ‘Oregon Commentator,’ a conservative/libertarian student paper, on OSPIRG