February 1, 2010

Hillary Clinton’s Rhetoric Masks Anti-Life Agenda

Population Research Institute.  “Putting People First”

January 18, 2010.  By Colin Mason and Steven Mosher.

The primary thrust of the Cairo conference was population control, with “women’s health” being used as a Trojan horse to that end.

What [Sec. of State Hillary] Clinton didn’t say was that, thanks to the opposition of the Vatican and a consortium of Catholic and Muslim countries, abortion was specifically ruled out as a means of population control. While the final document does contain a reference to “safe” abortion, it also states that “in no case should abortion be promoted as a method of family planning.” This is hardly the ringing endorsement of abortion implied by Clinton’s speech.

Clinton passes over this point without mention, instead preferring to assure the assembled population controllers and abortion rights groups that the U.S. under Obama is firmly on their side. She specifically refers to the United States’ renewal of funds for the UNFPA and the rescinding of the Mexico City Policy, both of which opened the floodgates for worldwide, taxpayer-funded abortions.

Remember Bill Clinton’s “safe, legal, and rare” dodge on abortion? Well, to read his wife’s speech, she wants it to be safe, legal, and common. After all, it would have to be common to bring down the world’s population.

Click to read full story:  ‘On the Anniversary of the Cairo Conference, Clinton’s Rhetoric Masks an Anti-Life Agenda‘.

February 1, 2010

Historical Look: Population Control Through Abortion

“How Abortion Became Popular – A Closer Look at Population Control”
From Choices in Matters of Life & Death by Judie Brown with Paul Brown.  1987.  Magnificat Press.

Keywords:  Thomas Malthus, Alan Guttmacher, Planned Parenthood, Hugh Moore, Paul Ehrlich, Catholic Church, birth control, Margaret Sanger

The population control movement actually started in the late 1700s with the writings of Thomas Malthus, who declared that it was necessary to control the number of people on earth. Malthus preached that by the early 1900s, the world would be so populated that there wouldn’t be enough room for all of us. Even at that early date in our history, birth control methods were being discussed, and among them was abortion.

It is unfortunate that those who promote abortion tell us repeatedly that they do not believe in abortion as a form of birth control, because their own leaders in the past definitely viewed it that way.

Alan Guttmacher’s early research concluded that at conception a new life begins, a composite of all the hereditary material of father and mother.  His book Life in the Making (1933) set forth his evidence that a complete human being exists from the moment of conception.  In the 1960s, however, as the president of Planned Parenthood, Guttmacher was arguing for legal abortions as a means of birth control. By this time he had stopped talking about the humanity of the unborn child.

The overpopulation myth was also fueled by Hugh Moore and Paul Ehrlich. Hugh Moore, the Dixie Cup millionaire, in the late 1960s, was promoting his idea that the world was in a crisis of overpopulation, which he blamed on the Roman Catholic Church. He purchased full-page ads in newspapers all across America to preach his message, trying to mold public opinion, and to some extent he succeeded. He warned people that the Roman Catholic Church wanted to control America, and that if it did, there would be millions and millions of people falling off the earth.

Moore engaged a research scientist by the name of Paul Ehrlich to write a book called The Population Bomb which was released as Moore’s ads began to appear in 1968.  The public read the ads and felt that they were accurate and began to believe that there were too many people in the world and that something had to be done.

In effect, public opinion was molded by the rich. Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood was also sponsored by a rich man. Sanger left her first husband and her children and eventually wound up divorcing her husband.  Noah Slee, her second husband, was the heir to the Three-in-One Oil fortune.  He provided millions of dollars to fund her and her activities, especially her major interest: controlling the children of minorities and children of the poor.

The people who changed public opinion were what the common man would view as elitists, people who wanted more of everything for themselves and less for those of the lower classes. These merchants of death got started with money from Three-in-One Oil, the Ford Foundation, the Rockefellers, General Motors and others.

With the growing public sentiment in favor of population control, eventually the federal and state governments got involved with funding family-planning programs. Today abortion propagandists, including Planned Parenthood, receive millions in federal funds (your tax dollars!) in addition to foundation and corporate support.

January 25, 2010

Contraceptives to help poor in Ethiopia cope with climate change

EVIL!

The population controllers are using climate change to advance the ABORTION agenda.

FACT:  When oral contraceptives fail, abortion is used as birth control.

The Catholic Church in America under the auspices of the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops have gotten onto the “Green Movement” bandwagon.

“In facing climate change, what we already know requires a response; it cannot be easily dismissed. Significant levels of scientific consensus—even in a situation with less than full certainty, where the consequences of not acting are serious—justifies, indeed can obligate, our taking action intended to avert potential dangers. In other words, if enough evidence indicates that the present course of action could jeopardize humankind’s well-being, prudence dictates taking mitigating or preventative action.”—-USCCB ‘Global Climate Change: a plea for dialogue, prudence, and the common good.’

The Portland Archdiocese supports Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth.”  Shame on them!

Contraceptives to help poor cope with climate change – environment – 24 September 2009 – New Scientist.

The purpose of this blog is bring awareness to the alliance between the abortion movement and the green movement.

January 16, 2010

Vatican Newspaper Slams the Copenhagen Summit over Population Control, “Nihilism”

An editorial in the Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano is denouncing the Copenhagen final agreement over the question of population control.

Vatican Newspaper Slams the Copenhagen Summit over Population Control, “Nihilism”.

January 9, 2010

Global Warming Alarmists Exploit Children

December 11, 2009

Chinese Minister Links ‘One-Child’ Policy to Emissions Reduction

Oh, no!  She forgot that, in reality, China has the worst pollution on the planet!  All those abortions – 400 Million – have made no impact whatsoever!

The [Chinese] policy on family planning proves to be a great success,” Zhao was quoted by the official Xinhua news agency as saying in Copenhagen, where she is one of Beijing’s delegates at the U.N. climate conference.

“It not only contributes to reduction of global emission, but also provides experiences for other countries – developing countries in particular – in their pursuit for a coordinated and sustainable development.”

Critics of the policy say it not only deprives individuals the right to choose how many children they want, but also gives rise to an array of human rights abuses including forced abortion and sterilization, infanticide, sex-selective abortions and the levying of punitive fines or loss of jobs for policy violators.

Arguments about links between global warming and population have circulated in population-control circles for years, but climate change negotiators have generally sidestepped them because of the sensitivities surrounding population-limiting policies. [Emphasis added.]

Earlier this week, Canada’s Financial Post said that humans are overpopulating the world and that a global law “such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate…”

According to the newspaper, despite its polluting coal plants, China “is the world’s leader in terms of fashioning policy to combat environmental degradation, thanks to its one-child-only edict.”

Click for full story

RELATED

‘The Whole World Needs To Adopt China’s One-Child Policy”—-Canada’s Financial Post

November 21, 2009

New UN Report Goes Green to Promote “Reproductive Rights”

November 19, 2009

(NEW YORK – Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute C-FAM) The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) released its annual State of the World Population Report yesterday, linking efforts to promote “sustainable development” and affect “climate change” to its “reproductive rights” agenda.  Critics see the report as a thinly-veiled attempt to harness popular environmental concerns in service of population control.

The report, “Facing a Changing World:   Women, Population and Climate [pdf],” asserts that achieving “universal access to reproductive health” would both contribute to declines in fertility and “help reduce green-house gas emissions in the long run.” It calls upon nations to “fully fund family planning services [read: abortion] and contraceptive supplies.”

Full Text:  New UNFPA Report Goes Green to Promote “Reproductive Rights–C-FAM


November 18, 2009

Hot Air Tour Exposes Global Warming Hysteria

Protest Al Gore in Portland Today, November 18.  The Hot Air Tour is sponsored by Americans for Prosperity.

CLICK BELOW FOR DETAILS:

Hot Air Tour:   Exposing the Ballooning costs of Global Warming Hysteria.